Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts

Friday, April 8, 2011

WOW!

Whattay article!

In a republic with a short history and a thin national narrative, cricket and Bollywood are India's baseball and apple pie. Rahul makes air quotes and says, "Indian culture."

I'm dreading the usual chaos of an Indian airport.

But once inside, I am transported. Is this the future? The place is new and serene. The floors are shiny. A fancy coffee kiosk teems with under-caffeinated commuters. The food court has a Subway, a Baskin-Robbins, a McDonald's, a Yo!China. There's a bookstore. A bronze elephant towers in the lobby.

That's when I see it.

There's a restaurant named Dilli Streat. It's a take on Delhi's famous street-food scene. It has slightly dressed-up versions of blue-collar classics. The concept is an ironic mixture of old and new, with a winking nod to a past seen as quaint yet valuable. Cynicism and irony, on back-to-back days.

India is changing at lightning speed.

I think of Jane Leavy's magnificent book about Mickey Mantle, and her documenting the moment when Americans began viewing our idols differently. India, it seems, is approaching that day. Another question about Tendulkar arises: Is he the final star athlete created by that deeply earnest society, the one with its suspension of disbelief fully intact?

Is he the last hero?

The thirst of a tabloid reporter and the love of a starstruck child are fruit from the same tree. Maybe the difference is intent, and maybe it's innocence, which sounds like the pitter-patter of tiny feet on marble floors. Kids chase their favorite cricketers around the hotel. Their joy restores faith, washes away cynicism. Maybe the soul of cricket can survive this landslide of change.

They seem so confident, not people who need any outside validation. Maybe Sachin isn't needed any longer. Maybe Sehwag is more representative. That hasn't occurred to me until now. Later I'll talk to an Indian journalist, Vaibhav Vats, who is writing about cricket as a window into national self-esteem. He thinks Sachin isn't as important as he used to be.

"It's about wealth," Vats says. "So you don't look for external things to shore up your own sense of identity. There isn't the identity crisis there was then."

Other kids take blue paint and, emulating a famous billboard around the country, tag themselves "Bleed Blue". Sports marketing creating fan behaviour creating more sports marketing: a snake eating its tail.

Andy saw a game in this stadium on television once, India versus Pakistan, and the cacophony when an Indian player bowled his opponent seemed to come out of his television and transport his London home across two oceans and several lesser seas. That noise is something he cannot forget. He's chasing that ghost, left a wife and two kids at home for six weeks to chase it halfway around the world.

Sunil begat Sachin begat Sehwag. From insecurity to confidence to aggression.

A feeling arises, a rare one, that you are part of a group watching something special. The power of sport is that, on occasion, it redeems the messes we create around it. Cricket can be stronger than the forces changing it. Victories are fleeting, but the poems are what matters. I don't know if cricket is about to be ruined, or if Sachin is no longer needed, if he's retiring or if he'll defy expectations and play 10 more years. These are things we can guess about but never know.

I do know this: I am a fan. I am sunburned but do not care. I lose track of time. That's not a narrative flourish. Hours seem like moments.

Rapture comes to the people here. I see Sachin constructing a score, and I understand the planning, and the years of experience, that lead a man to this field on this day, and to the artistry he now holds as part of himself, like a chamber of his heart. We are congregants in a church. We are watching the son of a poet. The stand-up comedian is serious. This is a perfect at-bat, Andy tells me. This is art, and I am lucky to see it. Soon, Sachin will be gone. This feeling will be gone. Right now, it is alive. It has the power of a name, immortal and pure.

Two pitches, two sixes. The air is sucked out of the stadium, and Bon Jovi is played again. But now, incredibly, the crowd noise is louder than the sound system. The real finally trumps the fake.

He's done it. A century. I've never been in a stadium that feels like this one. Hindus and Muslims, Sikhs and Christians, people from different castes and classes, speakers of a dozen languages, all citizens in the Republic of Sachin. The stern cops give wide smiles and thumbs-ups. The chant goes from "Sachin! Sachin!" to "Hoo… ha… IN-DI-A!" They are interchangeable.

The team is a proxy for the nation, so what does an Indian collapse tell them about India? About India without Sachin?

Now 59 from 48. Then India gets a wicket. Then a second in a row. The crowd comes alive. What does this revival tell them about their nation? About themselves?

Sachin Tendulkar says goodbye and closes his door, while, in every direction, a vast nation sees its hopes and dreams in him, for at least a little while longer. I step into the elevator, then a car, then three flights, then my car, then my house. I return from blind alleys and brightly lit fields, having found my moment of rapture and, at the end, the man who created it. I've found both the riddle and the answer, and I wonder what it must cost someone to be both of those things. One part of my conversation with Tendulkar will return to me every time India plays in this World Cup.

His agent told me he's aware of what he means to people, of the symbolic importance of being both the beginning and end of something. He is a bridge, and it is vital to the psyche of a nation that he remains intact. He gets it. That's why he never loses focus. Nothing, it turns out, is effortless. In his room, he seems tired, worn out mentally and physically. He needs a break. I ask when was the last time he had 20 days off in a row with nothing to do. No balls to hit or billions to represent.

"I'm waiting for that time to come," he says.

Sunday, April 3, 2011

We won!

3rd April, 2021. It's been 10 years. Exactly 10 years since I woke up with a wide smile, remembering the events of the previous night (don't be perverted la). When India's cricket World Cup winning streak began.

I was in university. I had finished my FYP the day after India defeated Pakistan in what many claimed was the final before the final. I had been looking forward to watching the real final in peace. And then my body decided to tell me, screw you for mistreating me in the last week, I'm gonna fall sick now.

So, barely able to go downstairs to even get myself lunch, I lay in bed till 5pm, which is when the match began. I was torn, should I risk getting worse by watching the match with everyone in Red Dot, or should I stay in bed and stream on my laptop. After the first wicket fell, and the links stopped streaming, I decided, forget it, I will have time to fall sick tomorrow, a WC win, I may not get to see again.

And the right decision it was.

What amazing inroads the Indian bowlers made into the Sri Lankan batting. They didn't give away too many runs, they took regular wickets. It looked all hunky-dory till the last 5 overs. It was 211/5 in 45 overs. A very chase-able total. It would end at 274/6 in 50. Not so easily chased.

Perhaps nothing told the story better than Zaheer's figures: 5-3-6-1 to 8-3-25-2 to end up at a ghastly 10-3-60-2. And I guess it says a lot when someone who is in the team in the role of a bowler is not even given his full quota of 10 overs (Sreesanth 8-0-52-0), while someone whom we still hesitate to dub as an all rounder is (Yuvraj 10-0-49-2).

When Sachin and Sehwag walked out to the centre to begin the chase, we all knew we needed one of them to fire to be able to chase this total down. Maybe a quick start from Sehwag, and then a grounded solid innings from Sachin should put them in good stead. Then 2nd ball from Malinga, plumb LBW. In true fashion, Sehwag went for the review. God only knows why, since if it had hit the bat, he of all people would have known. And it was given out. That is one thing that Sehwag can learn from Sachin. Even against Pakistan, the moment Sehwag was adjudged out, he asked for the review before even checking with his batting partner Sachin. It shows a disbelief and immaturity and a wondering out aloud, "how can I possibly be out!". It wastes a review, which in the later part of the match could change the game. Sachin, on the other hand, consulted long and hard with his partner before going for the review, and for him the decision was indeed overturned during the Pak match.

But anyway, with Sachin and Sehwag both gone within the first 7 overs, I think it was more a psychological defeat more than anything else for the whole of India. Who would get us out of this mess? Who would score enough so that we would surmount that increasingly unassailable looking target? The answer was partnerships. We often forget, in the shadow of brilliant cricketers, why the India batting line-up is so feared. Why any bastman, upto No. 7, is capable of single-handedly winning a match for us.

Gambhir and Kohli together gave the innings stability, and the more important thing they did in my opinion was to not let the asking rate creep up too high. It always stayed around 6, and we knew that if we did not lose wickets, we would eventually get there. There was hope yet.

As 21 year old Kohli departed to a blinder of a catch and bowled from Dilshan, Dhoni decided to promote himself up the order. As he himself mentioned later, "if we had not won today, there would have been many questions asked. Why Sreesanth, why not Ashwin. Why me, why not in-form Yuvraj at No. 4". Well, he proved all his critics (including me) wrong, and showed that he was not only a wicketkeeper-captain, but a batsman too. "On the big final's night, out came the calculative Dhoni, the perfect mix of caution and aggression, strong as an ox, fast as a hare, the same batsman that not long ago was quite deservingly the No. 1 in ODIs."

Sri Lankan fielders seemed to be everywhere. Every ball was hit like a boundary. Almost all were cut off. But the bastmen toiled. And we cheered. The crowd, Dhoni later said, gave the batsmen strength. "During the Gambhir-Kohli partnership, ever run was applauded as if it was a boundary."

And that 6 was such an amazing way to end it all. He stared at the ball till it cleared the ropes, while Yuvraj on the other end bellowed like a Singh. What a turn-around Yuvi has had in this WC! Man of the Tournament! Even he wouldn't have believed that was possible before the WC started.

In this match, they all batted like champions. They did not let the pressure get to them. There was no mad scramble to get runs, just patiently rotating the strike, with the occasional boundary to keep the run rate in check.

It was Team India's strategy to breeze through the Group stages and peak at the right time during the knockout games. And boy did it work. Both the QF and SF were dubbed as 2 finals before the final. To actually kick the long time winners of the WC out in the QF stage itself was monumental, though it was overshadowed by a Ind-Pak SF. Nothing, and I mean NOTHING is bigger than an Ind-Pak SF, except maybe an Ind-Pak Final. But that was not to be.

Dhoni had said after the Pakistan match that he had never seen India field so well, and never expected them to put up any better performance. Well they brought their "A Game", as they say, for the grand finale. "No matter how clumsy or unpolished their techniques, the oldest and creakiest of the Indians were diving to stop boundaries."

Perhaps the biggest lesson to be learnt from both Sachin's and Murali's relatively lackluster performances was that neither team depends solely on their "greats" to do the job for them. Neither needs a hero to save the day. What they really need is the whole team's effort.

Kohli said about Sachin "He has carried the burden of the nation for 21 years (as long as Kohli has been alive), its high time we carried him". But let us spare a thought for Murali. If Sachin is one of the best batsman ever, Murali is surely one of the best bowlers ever. He did not go out in style today. But he will forever be returned as one of the cricketing greats.

This WC, it's for Sachin. It's for Kapil Dev. It's for the unsung heroes - the support staff. It's for Team India. And it's for all the fans, in India, outside India.

We won.

Quotes:

"It was the first time in six weeks that MS Dhoni could be heard doing what can only be described as giggling."

"When Dhoni was asked how Yuvraj had been in the dressing room during the tournament, he replied with a smile: "He has been vomiting a lot," and then went on to answer the question."

"He spoke lucidly of what was going through his mind after he hit the winning runs. "Emotionally, I was confused; I wanted a wicket [stump]". But he found himself at the centre of the pitch with Yuvraj at the other end. "I thought hug-vug we will do later, first take the wicket." He then ran over to his own end to pull out the stump, after which Yuvraj jumped on him, pulling him into a bear hug. "It was an emotional moment," Dhoni said. "I was confused, I didn't know what to do at the time, how to show my emotions."

Some of the players had been struggling to sleep properly, but Upton believed - as it now seems - in something preordained. "Strangely I slept quite comfortably, because the job was done, we just needed to go and act out the script that was already written."

The nerves he felt towards the closing moments, despite himself being a mental conditioning coach, he said was a feeling like no other. "I get bloody nervous. Believe you me. It was magnificent."

Trivia:

‎1. India became the first host nation to win the tournament

2. Jayawardene became the first player to score a hundred in the final and finish on the losing side.

3. This was the highest run-chase ever achieved in a World Cup final.

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

India-Pakistan! :D

0.4 Why does Sehwag look so annoyed?

I have decided to just watch the match today. And not be concerned about winning or losing. I want a good match. And I think SL vs. Pak sounds good too.

Yes I think FYP has caused brain damage. I think I might come back to wanting Pak to lose after some wickets fall. Hope that doesn't happen for a long time.

What a 3rd over - 5 boundaries!

Sehwag gone but that is VERY VERY FAST outfield.

So apparently we can expect a rendition of "Chak De India" for every boundary. And of course, any announcement (usually about change is bowling) followed by the creepy "piya hooooooooooooooooo" sounding sound.

YESSS! A review not wasted! Sachin stays :D

2nd close call in 2 balls! 2 heart-in-mouth moments!

Pakistan may be awesome at bowling, India may be awesome at batting, but there is one thing we share: sucking if fielding :D

The commentators are such bitches. After Misbah dropped sachin's catch "Misbah is going to continue feeling miserable till Sachin goes." Well then I hope he feel miserable the whole match.

Haww so my touchpad stops working because I drop water on it. I restart my comp to find last 2 balls "W W". WTF

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

SL-NZ Semis!

Deepak: "hey Cricinfo why don't you post one of my comment on the page, i would like to take a screen shot of it and put it on my Facebook !! So plz one for me." People actually do that?

SJB: "I think it is English players bowling out there wearing NZ jerseys.." So fair, it's fair to say Sri Lanka's openers are beating them all, black and blue. Get the pun.
S Potnis: "Is that supposed to be a pun on skin colour? I'm black and I'm not ashamed of it. But unfortunately my girlfriend makes me apply Fair and Lovely thrice a day :("
Eh? It was a pun on the jersey colours of England and NZ. And, ewww!

Nathan McCullum and Dilshan exchange dinner plans for later near the bowler's end. Or so it seems. The umpire intervenes.

Southee to Tharanga, OUT, Ryder take a bow! Even fat men can fly says George Binoy! This Kiwi sure can fly. Was that Jesse Ryder or Jesse Owens? Here's what happened - it was a short ball outside off, enough width and room for Tharanga in his current form to flay at. Enough room for him to try and go aerial. Ryder was lurking at point. He moved quickly to his left, took off with as much grace as he is capable of and landed with a resounding thud. In the meantime, he caught the ball. And then he stood up with arms aloft, menacing beard and frown in place, like a WWE superstar. What a moment!

Kuldeep: "Maybe Dwayne Leverock has been conducting a "Catching For Fat People-101" class and Ryder has been his student!!!"
Mel: "If cows and Jesse can fly, can NZ win today?"

Bouncer from Southee, over-cooked and banged into his own half, it goes well over the batsman's head and Brendon takes off to collect it over his head. And its not called a wide. Even in the moon, given the lack of gravity there, that should have been wide.
Ashok: "7.1 ... Even in the moon, given the lack of gravity there, that should have been wide. Wrong analogy. Ball will bounce more on Moon as Gravity is less. Isn't it?"
Umm, that was my point. Even in the moon, that would have been wide though as a norm most balls would bounce a lot in the moon.
Science 101. The moon is lighter, and hence its ability to attract other objects towards itself, in other words gravity, is lesser.
Shyam: "Whats the big deal about that ryder catch? Kamran Akmal would have taken it 10 out of 10 times."
I have two responses to that comment.
1. Yes, Kamran normally takes the tough catches, it is the sitters that he drops.
2. Yes, in Bizarroworld.
Ankur: "Is the result of this match that obvious that people are discussing gravitation here?!"
On the contrary, the gravity of the situation is such that gravity is being discussed.
Manoj: "In moon it would be a noball because when a bowler jumps right before he delivers the ball, he jumps higher and lands further, crossing the crease."
Hmm, to avoid no-balls, his landing spot would have to be fixed.
Ravi: "Science 101: The moon is not "lighter", it has lesser mass. There is a difference."
Pardon me, for I have sinned.
Circe Magnifica: "Since when the situation is grave, you discuss gravity, would you discuss electrostatics and electrodynamics when the situation is electric? (Which, is almost always the case whenever anyone of the species Ravius Shastrius is commentating)" Great names, all round!
Biman: "@manoj: In moon bowlers can't get any swing or reverse swing. bcoz no air.."
Andy Zaltzman @Zaltzcricket on twitter: "Ghost of Isaac Newton responds to Jesse Ryder catch: "I might have been wrong about that apple on my head. Could have been coincidence."
Hahaha!

Thursday, March 24, 2011

India vs Australia coming right up!

Immense Zaheer continues his Australian opera

The world may not have noticed it, but there's a tumultuous opera on between Zaheer Khan and Australia. The first time they met in an ICC event, the 2000 Champions Trophy in Nairobi, Zaheer kicked down the door, burst onto stage, got Adam Gilchrist, yorked Steve Waugh and said, 'hello, sunshines.'

They meet again on Thursday, in the quarter-final of the World Cup. Not merely in another league or group or roundabout game, but a knockout. Between 2003 and 2011, the protagonists have had another minor scuffle, last May at the World Twenty20 in the Caribbean, but let's get real, this is the big one.

Finally, after all the preparation, he has got to the game where the opera will reach its abrupt conclusion.

In the tottering-teetering four weeks of India's World Cup, if Yuvraj Singh has been fire fighter with the bat and the ball, Zaheer has been its game-breaker. The leader of a bowling union that has been pilloried for lacking express pace and incisive spin, Zaheer has kept it all together, now second-highest wicket-taker in the tournament with 15 from six games.

He has become more than what the commentatariat love to call the 'go-to' bowler. He is now India's make-it-happen man, the partnership breaker, the kind of performer who can produce a performance from what seems like sheer will and a glowering expression. But this cricketing Heathcliff has been born out of the monotony of long practice and hundreds of overs bowled.

Javagal Srinath wrote this week, "I can say with conviction that I have not seen an Indian bowler show as much control as Zaheer has." And Srinath has seen several, some holy cows, others merely famous names.

In the World Cup, Zaheer's spells, particularly with the old ball and a command over the reverse, have been Aerodymanics 101 dished out with a soundtrack of cacophony. It is left-arm bowling with the illusion of angle and change of pace, in which the fast may be fearful but the slow can be equally sinister; as if sending the ball down 22 yards to a brute with a bat has nothing to do with either earth or air, but is merely a sleight of hand.

If you want to understand what bowlers like Zaheer are to captains, maybe Sachin Tendulkar can explain. He described what it was leading a team that had Anil Kumble. "If something was happening, I would give the ball to Anil. If nothing was happening, I would give the ball to Anil. If you needed to contain runs, you give the ball to Anil. If you needed to attack, you give the ball to Anil." Right now, replace the regal 'Anil' with the cool nickname of 'Zak' because it is what he has become in Tests and ODIs.

At one time, Zaheer used to be one of India's earliest 21st century bad-boy cricketers, his name clubbed in with that of his mate Yuvraj, who ironically, is another of India's standout performers in this World Cup. Today, Zaheer is a pillar of his team's bowling, a seasoned performer, whose career could turn into a case study in India's National Cricket Academy curriculum about how fast bowlers don't always have to fade away. They can just get smarter. VVS Laxman said of him, "People won't look at him for statistics, they will look at Zaheer for impact."

If he had to pick a moment of enormous impact, Motera on Thursday would be a pretty good choice.

Battle of the flawed heavyweights

This match can be seen through several prisms: champions of the world v pre-tournament favourites, misfiring middle order v misfiring middle order, pace-reliant attack v spin-heavy attack, athletic fielders v incompetent fielders. Australia against India is a clash between teams with obvious imperfections.

Off-field dramas aside, Australia's progress in this World Cup was smooth at first - a comfortable win against Zimbabwe, a smashing one against New Zealand - and then uninspiring, when they laboured against Kenya and Canada. In each of those matches, at least one weakness was evident: a captain struggling for form, a middle order troubled by turn, spinners incapable of striking, and fast bowlers with wonky radars. All of these frailties were exposed by Pakistan, who ended the legendary unbeaten World Cup run on 34 matches. Australia's successes have been built around the opening partnership of Brad Haddin and Shane Watson, and the energy of Brett Lee. That might not be enough to topple India - but it might, for MS Dhoni's team is far from the shoo-in semi-finalist it was expected to be.

Before the World Cup began India's batting line-up was thought to possess the armour of God, their bowling was considered less formidable but effective in home conditions, and the fielding was known to be average. As their campaign played out, it became evident that the armour didn't fit the middle order - there were collapses of 9 for 29 and 7 for 51 - and the bowling, while adequate on helpful surfaces, was mediocre on flat pitches. The fielding has not been average. It has been abysmal. Slow anticipation, slower approaches to the ball, failure to cut off angles, and plain lethargy have allowed opponents to run at will.


I read all these articles about how such brilliant battles are going to happen on-field. And then the whole Indian batting collapses. Or if miraculously, it doesn't, the bowlers and fielders give away all the runs they made while batting.

Please let this not be a one-sided match. And please let India win (the WC).

Saturday, March 12, 2011

India vs. SA

My "Twitter" feed

0.1: 5 matches begun with fours by Sehwag

"By the way, on this day in 2006, South Africa chased 434. Just saying ..."

1.3: van Wyk pulls a Kamran Akmal. Does not even move as Sehwag edges a ball towards him. Gets a 4 instead.

"i am a nervous wreck ...i cannot watch...the way sehwag is playing dangerously on the edge of my seat...he just might lose his wicket any moment and the momentum just slips ...plenty of evidence from the past," says Abhishek. Calm down man, it's only a group game!

Sehwag is hogging the strike here.

There was a time when Sehwag had played 37 balls, and Tendulkar only 9.

"Watching Sehwag play is like throwing an ice-cream in the air and catching it with your mouth. It's exhilarating if it works out, and you go hungry if it doesn't. I figured if I use such a ridiculous metaphor, my comment might actually get put up," says Archit.

End of over 8: 7 runs off it. The commentators call it a good over for SA. Says a lot.

"12 fours from 8 overs...what sort of score do they want?..This is great stuff," says Darryl.

10 overs: 87/0

8 fours, 1 six. This is the highest mandatory Powerplay score of the World Cup, beating India's performance against Netherlands.

11.2: Sehwag reaches 50! Off 44 deliveries. Brought up with a 4.

11.4: India reaches 100.

I remember when I was a kid, I always used to hope that India would score 100 in 10 overs. I always wondered why they never managed it. It seemed such simple calculation to me. 10*10 = 100 :D

"I think its fair to say that this World Cup has been a most entertaining one thus far. A few upsets, a tie, Ireland's heroics and glimpses of progress made by the Dutch and the Canadians etc., has made it wonderful to watch. Never mind some of the flat pitches. Everyone loves to see some lusty hitting, and both sides get equal opportunity to do so, too!" says Ron.

13.3: Sachin almost goes at 49, after a amazing catching chance by already injured de Villiers.

13.4: Sachin gets to 50 in 33 deliveries. As the commentators keep commenting, we know Sehwag plays crazy cricket, but Sachin has just played amazing cricket. The crowd has gone beserk.

"Sehwag and Tendulkar have been quite impartial to all the bowlers - No one has done better than 8/over and no one did worst than 10/over," writes Leo. They're equal-opportunities batsmen!

14.5: A really, REALLY high rise size from Sachin, which eventually just about crosses the rope.

15.1: Talking about late cut, how late was this. The wicketkeeper almost had it in his gloves, when Sehwag hit it.

SMV: "India could have taken the batting powerplay straight away. They dont need one when Pathan is batting in the slog overs as it doesnt make any difference to him." We're advocating for it in the Cricinfo office! Why not?

16 overs, 17 fours, 2 sixes. So 80/137 runs have come in boundaries.

Arshad: "Clearly India have forgotten Gandhi's message of non-violent action in South Africa." Clearly!

17.4 Some wonderful entertainment comes to an end with the departure of Sehwag. Bowled in.

19.1: 150 comes up for India.

It seems too good to be true right now. Though now it has become a little more sane. The commentators keep saying a big score is definitely in the offing. I keep wondering if SA will pull off a miracle here.

30.2: 200 comes up for India.

35.5: Sachin gets 100. The crowd is deafening.

36.6: Gambhir gets to 50. He's played an understated yet amazing supporting role.

Milestones out of the way. Time to get the scorecard going again.

"The only way to top Tendulkar's fabulous century is to see the New Zealand Prime Minister face an over from Shane Warne, tomorrow at the Basin Reserve in Wellington - a Christchurch earthquake fundraiser," says John

Gambhir is hitting too wildly for my taste.

Ok he's finally connecting ball and bat well, after some wild hits off Steyn.

That is the problem in the final overs when India plays well. Too many people start watching, and the links go dead.

39.4: Ugh Sachin is gone, caught at point. 111 off 101 balls. Amazing innings.

Who's next? Kohli? Yuvraj? Dhoni? Pathan? (I just wanted to list down India's awesome batting lineup) :D

40.1: Gambhir has loyally followed Sachin back to the dressing room. Pathan is in though, in place of Sachin, and Yuvraj replaces Gambhir.

2 very new batsmen at the crease.

40.3: And now Pathan is gone. The awesome batsmen are being stupid. 3 wickets in 6 balls. Actually Smith took an awesome high catch.

"The Indian middle order looks rudderless right now. 350 is looking further and further away ..."
A gettable score this looks like becoming.

Yuvraj and Dhoni. What can they do in 55 deliveries?

Nothing it seems.
There is a sense of bewilderment in Nagpur. India were 267 for 1 ... they are 296 for 9 now.

Only God can explain why tailenders are trying to be heroes and aiming for sixes. While Dhoni seems to have forgotten how to bat in death overs. Taking a single to get a tailender on strike is all he's doing. Isn't he supposed to be the smart and responsible captain?

This is too painful to watch. Just something to note for the teams playing India, if India is doing really REALLY well, not to worry. They will self-destruct soon enough. Is there a special word for choking in the first innings?

48.4: All out.

AMAZING. Who would have guessed this would happen after 39.3 overs (before Sachin departed)? There was talk of them reaching a 400 around the 1th over. Now I knew they would never get to 400, but 350 seemed very gettable. And now the grand target is not even 300.

"The world's best batting lineup has imploded in the most spectacular fashion."

India choked in the first innings. Let's hope SA returns the favor in the second. Though the Indian bowling lineup doesn't give me much hope.

297. Will it be enough?

300/7. Apparently not. I want to cry. And kill Nehra.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Wurr-ld Cup

I am so happy that Brittania Good Day is now available in Gulf countries. (Why on earth would they use this as their marketing strategy?) And I feel so sad that Gillette is the best a man can get.

Cricinfo is becoming hilarious! :D

Sekhar sends in the best question of the day so far: "How do we pronounce Szwarczynski?" Here's the answer - Stand up on a stool, lift your left hand and tilk your head upwards and to the left. Now squint hard and calculate the net run-rate of Netherlands upto the fourth decimal.. Now then.. What was the question again?

Barresi and Eric Unpronounceable are out there.

@Rameshsrivats on Twitter: "Szwarczynski and Eoin should have an exchange deal. Swap a few vowels & consonants."

What an odd team England are. They are comprehensively prepared, and admirably focused. They are honed with scientific exactness, and led with calm assurance by an irrefutably level-headed captain-and-coach combination. And they are wildly inconsistent. They are like a man who dresses like an accountant, talks like an accountant, lives in a comfortable suburban house, and sleeps in spreadsheet-print pyjamas. But who is actually the lead singer of a thrash metal band, with an unrivalled collection of exotic snakes.

Ireland upset win was AWEsome! Bloody brilliant I tell ya.

Then New Zealand came up with this gem:

New Zealand RR 6.04
Last 5 ovs 100/2 RR 20.00

For all their wild assortment of international players, none of the Canadian cricketers seemed to know how to bat. What a waste of good bowling. I wonder how they got to Associate qualifiers finals.

I can think of few, if any, experiences in sport to match watching Tendulkar succeed in a home game. Roger Federer may occupy a similar status of universally-acknowledged greatness within tennis, but I think it is fair to say that Switzerland is not quite as passionate about tennis as India is about cricket. If Federer were to simultaneously play tennis whilst hoarding gold and providing banking facilities for dubious dictators, perhaps the fervour of his support would match that for Sachin. But the Swiss population is unlikely ever to top the one billion mark.

The Truth Told to Shame the Devil
"Everyone did well other than Sreesanth," Virender Sehwag declared at the press conference after the opening game, against Bangladesh. Cue much delight and eloquence about how Viru pulled no punches on the field and off it. Chortle.

The Unhittable
This old dog's bite's as bad as his bark: Muttiah Muralitharan went two full matches in a row with not a single boundary struck off him and currently has an economy rate of 3.59 and average of 24. Not bad for a pensioner, given that it's a batsman's game and all. The only fours and sixes hit off Murali so far have been by Canada, that bunch of striplings with no respect for their elders.

The Trouper
Like a punch-drunk, much-battered movie monster you just can't kill, the unsinkable Shoaib Akhtar keeps coming back. A little the worse for wear, a bit more creaky in the joints than usual, and the proud possessor of a limp with a capital L, Shoaib waded in against Sri Lanka and produced a screamer like of old, shooting through Mahela Jayawardene's defence to take his middle stump. Drama fans hugged each other and wiped nostalgic tears from their eyes.

Thursday, March 3, 2011

Ireland vs. England!

It was an amazing match, wasn't it? For 74 overs, it went exactly like it was supposed to. England made a mammoth 300+ total, Ireland floundered early in their innings to reach 111 for 5.

And then O'Brien decided, nah, let's shake things up a little. Let's screw with Strauss, make the fastest century ever in World Cups, something not Sehwag, Afridi, Hayden ... (insert names of fast scoring batsmen here) have been able to do, and chase down the highest total ever in WC along the way. Just a minor side effect.

Bloody brilliant I tell you.

Only bad thing is that they're playing India next. Promises to be a good match.

Cricinfo quotes:

An elderly Irishman, his eyes glistening with pride, said it all. "The Indian fans are good and friendly. But after today, watch out India. You are next." The Green Army marches on.

Foot-stomping. Beer Guzzling. Laughter. The Cinderellas of World Cricket might have been expected to return to sackcloth after midnight, but the party has only just begun.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Bhajji da jalwa

Don't you just love cricinfo and their commentary?

India-SAfrica 3rd Test, India's 1st innings.

Harbhajan. Will he "show us how to bat"?

84.4
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 136.8 kph, another one lands back of a length and goes away like a monster. Harbhajan stays in the crease, thinks of dangling his bat at it and then pulls away

84.5
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 134.6 kph, this is a better leave, Steyn keps doing his thing, away seamers at immense pace, this time Harbhajan leaves easily

84.6
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 135.0 kph, how did Harbhajan survive that? Pushes almost in fear at another express delivery that moves away from the line of off stump. He played at it in hope, without moving the feet and it burst through that pretence of a shot without taking the edge

86.1
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, 1 run, Harbhajan gets a ball similar to the one that ate Pujara up, but this one did not deviate that much. As a result, though he got completely squared up, he managed to get bat on it and poke it into the covers. Crucially, he's away to the non-striker's end

Boy, if new balls could talk, this one is screaming its head off.

87.1
Morkel to Harbhajan Singh, FOUR, right, Harbhajan reckons he has a better chance of scoring at this end. He backs away, gets into position to deal with Morne's normal length and slams a short ball with ugly efficiency over wide mid on.

87.2
Morkel to Harbhajan Singh, no run, that shot suggests he's in the last over of a Twenty20 match. Needing 36 runs to win. Stays back in the crease and lets off a mighty swish just outside the line of off. The ball was approximately a foot further outside off

87.3
Morkel to Harbhajan Singh, 1 run, Harbhajan plays a shot no one else has ever played, or ever will. He backs away outside leg stump, Morne follows him with a yorker on the toes and Harbhajan lifts his left foot off the ground to save his ankles and plays it towards long on

87.6
Morkel to Harbhajan Singh, no run, Harbhajan gives it another almighty hoick, but was hopelessly late on his attempt to slam Morne's pacy, lifting length ball into stratosphere. He was hardly into his follow through when Boucher collected it

88.4
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, back of a length, Harbhajan plays a shot from his tennis manual. Bottom edges an attempted slap towards the slips

88.5
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run

88.6
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, What material is that stump made off? Use it to cut diamonds, I say! Steyn delivers another one of those pythons that lands on a length on middle and off, and seams away, leaving Harbhajan's attempted prod in another zip code altogether. It hits something on the way. South Africa go up in a huge appeal. The ball deviated off something. Turns out it hit the off stump on its way. The bails were not interested in falling down. Steyn is miffed beyond words!

Ladies and gentlemen. Steyn is bowling one of the best spells of fast bowling you will ever see. Please inform your friends. Bowling change, Morne gives way to Tsotso.

89.6
Tsotsobe to Harbhajan Singh, 2 runs, 132.5 kph, he backs away towards off stump again, setting himself up for a pull. Tsotso hurries him into the shot this time, but Harbhajan still gets enough meat on it to evade the infielders and land safely around deep midwicket for a couple

92.5
Morkel to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 137.9 kph, more fishing outside off stump from the Harbhajan book of angling. Morne gets this one to hold its line after landing on a length outside off, Harbhajan doesn't move his feet and has a waft, well away from the line of the delivery

That will be drinks after a riveting, crackling, absolutely terrific ripper of a session. Boy!

99.3
Harris to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 82.4 kph, Harbhajan won't mind that at all. It landed on a length outside off, missed his airy drive and turned away like a top. On steroids. It went straight into first slip's hands. Wry smiles all round.

100.5
Tsotsobe to Harbhajan Singh, 3 runs, 135.7 kph, That's mowed with as much violence as you can exhibit, without actually managing to time the ball. Short delivery, angles into position for Harbhajan's cow corner slap and he mis-times it. It rolls along towards the boundary and Prince tags it all the way to save the fourth run.

102.1
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 135.0 kph, the first one angles down the leg side, taking Harbhajan's pad on the way as he misses the glance

104.1
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 136.4 kph, thick inside edge onto the pads. Else, Harbhajan might have been dead plumb. Playing back to a fast, back of length delivery, destined for the top of off stump

104.2
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 133.9 kph, and he tries to slam him over the Table Mountain. And fails. Length ball, hint of away shape from outside off, Harrbhajan was on the back foot looking to smear that out of Cape Town, but missed it by a mile and a week.

104.3
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 141.1 kph, Steyn's building up the pace now, short length ball, angling into Harbhajan, who does well to hop back on the back foot and work it to the leg side

104.4
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, SIX, 137.5 kph, Harbhajan has just played the shot of the match. Of the series. Of the South African summer. Length ball on middle and off, Harbhajan doesn't bother with trifles like foot work. He stays back and drills the bat down in one, smooth, devastating swing. And makes fearsome contact. And then he holds his pose. The ball sails easily over long on. Harbhajan has a wry smile on his face. Business as usual. He hardly strained a muscle and sent the world's top fast bowler packing over long on. On a day when he has bowled the spell of the series. This Test match continues to throw up some utterly unbelievable moments. It brought up 2000 runs for Harbhajan in Tests. Can't think of a more stylish way to bring up a milestone.

Something seems to have gone into Harbhajan's eye. He's getting some treatment for it. And now he's ready.

104.5
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 145.8 kph, saw that coming didn't you. Steyn lets rip a steamy bouncer that was destined to hit Harbhajan on the head. He weaved away like Mohammad Ali in his prime and dropped his wrists. Good idea.

104.6
Steyn to Harbhajan Singh, no run, 140.4 kph, another short ball, but this time it slides harmlessly down the leg. Harbhajan wants to smash it, but misses. Steyn has a smile, Harbhajan has a smile. Friendly banter ensues!

How Harbhajan survived the new ball will remain one of the great unsolved mysteries of the game. Especially that ball from Steyn which crashed into off stump without dislodging a bail. "Act of God," as George Binoy puts it.

We have a long time to go in the year, but I doubt if we'll see a better spell of fast bowling all year. Sachin weathered the storm, with some luck, with lot of gumption and with some help from Harbhajan who has his own methods.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

Why Australia is definitely going to lose the Ashes.

Australia? Don't make me laugh. Brilliantly written article. Some excerpts below.


As the cricket match-fixing scandal pinballs around between annoying, disappointing depressing and alarmingly sinister, this blog will ignore for now the murky morass that threatens to swamp the international game, forget about the potential implications of Zulqarnain’s unscheduled London jaunt, and distract itself from the grim realities of reality with an altogether chirpier topic (from a pre-Ashes England supporter’s point of view) – Australia being not very good anymore.

Katich is also reported to be suffering from an existential crisis of confidence after accidentally seeing video footage of himself batting (Cricket Australia had successfully protected him from seeing himself for years, using a series of increasingly convoluted distractions, including puppet shows. Katich loves puppet shows. Can’t get enough of them. He owns DVD box sets of all TV puppet shows. And if that is not true, let him sue me.) “Oh my god, no,” he said, dumbfounded, after watching himself ungainlily nudge a leg-side boundary. “I thought I played like David Gower.”

He [Shane Watson] averages only 30 when Australia lose the toss (compared with 47 when they win it), suggesting that Ponting’s coinflipwork and Strauss’s head-or-tail preferences could be crucial to Watson’s success or failure.

Anyone telling you that Ricky Ponting has not declined over the last few years is either talking about a different Ricky Ponting, or has been poisoned with a mind-altering potion, or has seriously misheard the question, or is Ricky Ponting, or is trying to wilfully engage you in an unwinnable argument whilst their accomplice steals your electrical goods and/or priceless collection of David Boon memorabilia.

No Australian captain has ever lost three Ashes series. Ten years ago the prospect of Australia losing three Ashes series in the rest of eternity seemed remote. But then again, they said man would never walk on the moon. Ponting is all set to become Australia’s Neil Armstrong.

He [Michael Hussey] was once within touching distance of Bradman. Now he rubs statistical shoulders with Wavell Hinds, Manoj Prabhakar, and Chris Tavaré. Could still bump his average back up into the 80s this Ashes, but only if he scores 2500 undefeated runs in the series.

After smiting three centuries in his first six Tests, [Marcus] North has averaged 29 in his last 13 matches. Traditionally in Australia, this leads to impeachment by Parliament and disappearance to the Dirk Wellham Memorial Gulag, 150 miles outside Darwin. North has been out for 10 or less in more than half of his 32 Test innings, and his five ducks make him the most regular duck scorer in the Australian top six since the 19th century. To where some Australian supporters seem to want him to emigrate.

[Mitchell] Johnson is becoming the Australian Steve Harmison. If Harmison bowled one of the great series-losing balls in Ashes history in Brisbane four years ago, Johnson bravely attempted to steal his thunder with one of the immortal series-losing spells in Ashes history with his geometry-expanding effort at Lord’s. Having come to England with a reputation as a bowler who could bowl unplayable balls, he proved that reputation well deserved - albeit that the balls were only unplayable due to their being unreachable.

[Doug Bollinger] Has never dismissed an Englishman in a Test. Largely through lack of opportunity, admittedly. Has also been injured, and might not play in the first Test, extending his lifelong habit of not dismissing Englishmen in Tests. Startlingly inept batsman. Possibly hair-replacement-themed teasing victim.

If Australia pick him [Ben Hilfenhaus] and Bollinger, they will lose. The last time they picked two seam bowlers with tri-syllabic surnames – Gillespie and Kasprowicz in 2005 – they lost.

On previous Ashes tours, England’s positive statements in advance of their inevitable first-Test mincing sounded not so much like men clutching at straws as men pointing their fingers nervously at what they thought might be a straw, and mumbling something about being confident that it was probably a straw, and that they were definitely planning to try to think about clutching it. This time their public confidence is well founded. England are quite a good team. As are Australia. It will be a draw. A glorious draw.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Two Royal teams, Rajasthan Royals and Royal Challengers Bangalore. By the end of tonight, we'll know who is royaler.

Lol.

Friday, December 4, 2009

Have I ever cared about fielders?

Sehwag now has five of the 10 fastest double-centuries in history, including three of the first four. This though is a man utterly insouciant when it comes to such landmarks. He could well go on to obliterate Lara's record tomorrow. He certainly has a great chance to put even Bradman in the shade and score a third triple. None of those possibilities is likely to make him lose sleep though. For someone who has reduced batting to its most elemental, only the next ball matters. If it's there to be hit, regardless of whether he's on 299 or 399, he'll go for it. Which is precisely why it's such a bloody privilege to watch him play. Those that passed up a chance to come to Churchgate on Thursday would be best off reading the Mishima guide to seppuku.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

IPL trivia

Is it just me or do (almost) all cricketers look good? Specially the non-Indian ones. I mean of course Balaji and Murali don't, but Collingwood, Fleming, Vettori, and of course Dravid. Wah wah. Kya banaya hai :D

Chi chi I sound so pervy.

Anywho, the match between Chennai and Delhi is amazingly poised at the moment. Last 3 balls of 1st innings were a disappointment. Manoj Tiwary is an ass. If de Villiers had been able to play them, the score would have been even better. But kudos to him for an amazingly entertaining century. And of course to Dilshan for his half-century.

The ball just seems to keep flying out into the stands so many times. Wicked stuff. Poor bowlers. Flintoff gave off 50 off his 4 overs. No respect given to his reputation.

Good good.

Monday, April 20, 2009

IPL 19th April

1st match of the day: Punjab vs. Delhi.

Thrilling match! And the fact that a 40 over match becomes even shorter. Who would have imagined, even 2 years back, that an 18 over match would actually produce results!

1st innings:
Mumbai is put to bat by Sehwag. Amazing stuff before the break by the openers. But then in comes Vettori and PooF go all the wickets! Really bad performance towards the end by the batsmen. And I so expected the last ball to be a wicket. And it was! Haha.

2nd innings:
I love Sehwag! The guy so has no respect for any bowler whatsoever. Starts and ends with a 6. LOL. And thank God the rain stopped and the match could actually produce a result. But really entertaining 2nd innings :)

2nd match: Kolkata vs. Deccan

1st innings:
This feels like the Test version of a Twenty20 match. With an average that has dropped to as low as 2.74! But then its against Deccan, who ended last in the previous season, so I guess its a battle of who sucks more. I hope the pace picks up after the break.

Ahh it gets worse after the break. Attempts are made to score faster, but wickets are falling everywhere.

And its all over. Didn't even last the 20 overs. But they did manage to get over 100. So I guess the chase shall be not so meaningless and easy.

2nd innings:
Nice start, despite the loss of a couple of wickets. Deccan has seemed to be in control, pretty much the whole match till now. Lets see if Kolkata can pull out a rabbit out of their hat here. They really need it.

Btw don't there seem to be too many needless run-outs happening?

And it ends. Deccan have done it. In style. Definitely nothing loser-ly about this one.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

IPL Mania begins!

So IPL has started.

I did not follow it AT ALL last year, so am really looking forward to it this time. And I'm glad each match ends in like 3 hours, so since its the time leading up to exams, its chutti. But need to study. So Twenty20 matches provide an ideal way to take 'breaks'.

The issue about which team to support: I find it a very stupid idea to support teams whose names are based on cities, states or even regions. I support India, and I refuse to pick a team which has most players whom I've never heard of and a smattering of some 'bought' firangis. Don't they feel so violated to be auctioned off? I guess the money makes it all worthwhile. Hmm. Oh and I don't have any favourite players, so that can't be the criterion.

Oh yes the issue of money. IPL stinks of money. It is such an in-your-face thing that the whole darned thing is about earning money, about cashing in on the cricket fever that perenially grips the nation. A break after 10 overs, to rake in money, is like OMG aren't you rich enough already. The dog running in and stopping play for 10 minutes during the 1st match must have earned lots of money.

And why does every team have a truckload of players to choose from? I counted 52 for Deccan. I doubt if even half of them get to play a decent amount of cricket.

Also, about the venue. I think this article sums its up pretty nicely when it talks about how different the feel is when IPL cricket is uprooted from its birthplace and taken to a foreign country that knows nothing about how to go crazy about cricket!!